One of the world’s leading wildlife photographers and film-makers
United Sites
- GAVIN WATSON – RAVING ‘89 EXHIBITION
- Frankie Smith – Double Dutch Bus
- Let Them Know: the BYO Holiday Infomercial
- Woman Domesticated | America’s Finest News Source
- Pokemon is the Devil
- Tonya Harding Fan Fic – The Rejects
- Punknews.org | 90s punk documentary “One Nine Nine Four” raising money to complete film
- DOUBLE CROSS: Joey Vela – Breakaway part II
- Improv of the Bells
- UNTIL THE LIGHT TAKES US
- WTF
- Juggernauts are the hard-to-kill villains on Modern Warfare 2
- Clash of the Juggernauts. (sp?)
- Happy Holidays from Beth and Ramin!
- World Cup Speed Skating Photogs
Recent Comments
those are all in northern california. stop trying to take credit for everything norcal does, southern california
True, but you are still leading the viewer through your inevitable role as photographer. Where you print and display your image is where your power of mitigating the responses of your audience ceases. Still, I do think that in your photography, you’ve created a consistent way of seeing that you share with your audience. The subject matter might be random, but there is intended perspective inherent in each shot. How your audience takes it is of course subjective – but it’s because of the new view that....
Susan, very beautifully put…And extremely well said. Seeing does not always have to make ’sense’ to the viewer. It should have the random freedom and constant access to stir the emotions in any way the viewer allows to be stirred…or doesn’t allow. That’s part of the beauty of visual pieces, whether being the viewer or creator…The emotion intended will ‘hit home’ differently for each individual..
Also, a way of seeing doesn’t require a narrative structure. Collections are meant to be conglomerations, and it’s up to the collector to decide a rhythm, a tone, or a melody. Collections leave the spectator with work to do, and they open portals to other paths walked, experienced, and captured. One image edited to fit another is fine, but why can’t randomness be part of seeing? Why does seeing have to make sense all the time? Scattered imagery and undefined narratives – mismatched pictures upon a....
Fantastic images and very moving. Thanks for that..