<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Adriana-Teresa on The Click</title>
    <link>https://theclick.us/tags/adriana-teresa/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Adriana-Teresa on The Click</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.157.0</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://theclick.us/tags/adriana-teresa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Elisabeth Biondi In Conversation with Adriana Teresa, FotoVisura</title>
      <link>https://theclick.us/2011/04/29/elisabeth-biondi-in-conversation-with-adriana-teresa-fotovisura/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://theclick.us/2011/04/29/elisabeth-biondi-in-conversation-with-adriana-teresa-fotovisura/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Categorizing photography is controversial. For example, the category of ‘photojournalism’, in my opinion, is an exceedingly narrow definition. It traditionally demanded that photography be defined as close to events as they unfolded avoiding interpretation. When I started working with GEO in the 70’s, it meant something extremely narrow and factual, and today we might, perhaps, call it ’hard news’. It was then solely defined in terms of factual parameters. Magnum photographers were the exception to the rule. They each saw the world with their own eyes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
