—
by
Two current photography exhibitions that present work developed posthumously raise the question: Is this what the artist intended?
via WSJ: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303978304579473381260992254
But what if they had died and left behind rolls of film that no one ever developed, even as negatives? Do exposed frames even qualify as photographs or only as potential ones? How is someone supposed to know how to perform a “score” that the artist never finished?