Proving The Wrong Point With The Wrong Arguments Or How Photography Competition Juries Harp On The Trivial While Ignoring The Egregious « The Spinning Head

So let me understand this: its the tiny shoe that was erased that is the problem here and not the fact that nearly 90% of the original image was simply cropped, a small area of focus was then enlarged, color converted, burned and dodged and a completely ‘new’ image created for submission.

Link: Proving The Wrong Point With The Wrong Arguments Or How Photography Competition Juries Harp On The Trivial While Ignoring The Egregious « The Spinning Head