The AFP stand point of view illustrates the obsolescence of a model, the blindness of few disillusioned veterans, who try to stop any kind of progress. Things cannot be like they were at the last century, in an analog world; they eventually will evolve, with or without their consent. Standing against Morel, Harrington and Leroy have very conveniently adopted a legal posture, but by avoiding questioning the rules and by refusing to even consider the new ways photographers actually work, they’ve disconnected themselves from the future.
Link: Haiti Schism, Morel vs. AFP | bulb by Gerald Holubowicz
via: duckrabbit