a picture of Sarah Palin in a bikini holding a gun
Link: PDNPulse: MSNBC Apologizes for Airing Fake Photo of Sarah Palin
a picture of Sarah Palin in a bikini holding a gun
Link: PDNPulse: MSNBC Apologizes for Airing Fake Photo of Sarah Palin
Past and present ruminations about what is and isn’t a photograph have been a source of frustration for me. For one, people can draw whatever lines they wish to determine the point at which m…
via Prison Photography: http://prisonphotography.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/redacting-violence-the-photo-manipulations-of-josh-azzarella/
Several Web sites repeated Monday erroneous allegations that The New York Times had paid a ransom for the release of its reporter David Rohde, held by the Taliban for seven months.
via At War Blog: http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/times-responds-on-reporters-kidnapping/
The conclusion of the Depression-era photo-fakery series, with an account of a visit with the subject of “Migrant Mother.”
via Opinionator: http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-7/
Link: The Case of the Inappropriate Alarm Clock (Part 6) – Errol Morris Blog – NYTimes.com
Often, direction on the part of the photographer is applied in the reenaction of a scene. In such cases, it becomes necessary to interrupt the natural course of action by stopping or repeating.
In the fifth installment on Depression-era photography and photo-fakery, the focus is on Walker Evans.
via Opinionator: http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/22/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-5/
If Walker Evans moved furniture around to stage photos for “Let Us Now Praise Famous Men,” did that constitute photo-fakery?
via Opinionator: http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-3/
The second installment of an investigation into the matter of the famous depression-era cow-skull photo.
via Opinionator: http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-2/
In the 1930s, a photo of a cow skull leads to charges of photo-fakery and involves FDR, the Farm Services Administration and an enormous amount of press.
via Opinionator: http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-1/
Arrest 1 (1965) by Bridget Riley I’d like to propose an alternative method to discuss issues of race in visual culture and the photographic industry, but first some preliminaries. HUGO AND TH…
via Prison Photography: http://prisonphotography.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/photography-and-race-conference/
Link: What is Time magazine thinking? | dvafoto:
for a magazine such as Time, which I still believe has journalistic importance and merit, this photo essay of illustrations denigrating Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize in such a ham-handed and childish and poorly-executed way…I’m at a loss for words
Marianne Kirby: It’s a sad commentary on the magazine industry when even the most attractive women in the world are retouched in Photoshop
via the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/09/magazine-industry-retouched-photoshop
Garry Gross, Richard Prince and the story behind the Brooke Shields photograph
via the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph
This week a photograph of a nude 10-year-old Brooke Shields was removed from Tate Modern on police advice. But when the image first appeared in Playboy in the 70s there wasn’t even a ripple of shock
via the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2009/oct/03/attitude-to-children-in-seventies
Link: Lifting the Veil of Mere Pixel Perfection – NYTimes.com:
Concerned that girls and women feel excessive pressure to live up to the digitally botoxed and liposuctioned images of human perfection they see in glossy magazines, lawmakers in Britain and France are trying to get marketers to acknowledge the tweaking done to the photos. Under their proposals, ads containing altered photos of models would be required to carry disclaimers.
Link: PDNPulse: TIME’s Detroit Cover: How Much Toning is Too Much?:
Does the version of the photo on TIME’s cover go too far with photo manipulation?
Link: From the Archive: Not New, Never Easy – Lens Blog – NYTimes.com:
In two years of global warfare, America had yet to see almost any pictures of dead Americans.
Then, in September 1943, an issue of Life magazine arrived in people’s homes and at their corner newsstands. It forced them to confront a stark, full-page picture by George Strock that showed three American servicemen sprawled on Buna Beach in New Guinea; two face down, one supine; their lifelessness unmistakable even in a still photograph.
Link: Readers’ Voices: Public and Private Trauma – Lens Blog – NYTimes.com:
No subject we’ve tackled in the first four months of the Lens blog has touched quite so raw a nerve as our Sept. 4 post (”Behind the Scenes: To Publish or Not?“) about a decision by The Associated Press to distribute a photograph taken in Afghanistan by Julie Jacobson. It showed Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard, 21, of the Marines, after he was mortally wounded during a Taliban ambush last month.
Link: A Photo Editor – Is Photo Manipulation Bad For Photography?:
Grayson and Mike at Outside Magazine asked me to write an essay for their photography issue and we settled on the topic of photo manipulation. It’s certainly a hot button issue these days not only because of how easy it’s gotten to make realistic fakes but also because it’s gotten easier to publicly debate it and uncover forgeries that are passed off as real.